{"id":14554,"date":"2026-08-04T01:12:36","date_gmt":"2026-08-04T01:12:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news.theck1.no\/?p=14554"},"modified":"2026-08-04T01:12:36","modified_gmt":"2026-08-04T01:12:36","slug":"single-dimm-ddr5-gaming-works-better-than-you-probably-think-one-ddr5-dimm-beats-dual-channel-ddr4-ram-amds-3d-v-cache-chips-drop-less-than-3-with-single-stick","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news.theck1.no\/?p=14554","title":{"rendered":"Single-DIMM DDR5 gaming works better than you probably think \u2014 one DDR5 DIMM beats dual-channel DDR4 RAM, AMD’s 3D V-Cache chips drop less than 3% with single stick"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n Jake Roach <\/strong>
\n •
\nJuly 31, 2026\n<\/div>\n\n

<\/p>\n

\n

There\u2019s been a shift toward using a single DIMM of DDR5 to skirt the worst of the RAM pricing<\/u><\/a> crisis. AMD has suggested to us previously, at least, that it\u2019s an option PC builders are exploring, and it\u2019s a wrinkle that\u2019s shown up in dozens of prebuilts; one that we\u2019ve been careful to avoid when recommending products, particularly during peak shopping events. But just how much gaming performance are you giving up with a single DIMM when using one of the best CPUs for gaming<\/u><\/a>? <\/p>\n

The conventional wisdom is that you\u2019re giving up quite a bit of performance, resting on the ideas of previous DDR generations, where going down a single stick will cut your bandwidth in half. The same is true with DDR5, but things are a bit messier, which we\u2019ll dig into later. <\/p>\n

At a high level, using a single DDR5 DIMM doesn\u2019t compromise gaming performance by nearly as much as you might expect. We saw drops of around 8% to 10% across Intel and AMD CPUs, and less than a 5% difference with AMD\u2019s Ryzen 7 9800X3D. <\/p>\n

A proper dual-channel configuration is still the way to go for optimal performance. However, our testing shows that even a single DDR5 DIMM offers superior performance to dual-channel DDR4<\/u><\/a> on CPUs that support both memory generations. <\/p>\n

Using a single DIMM isn\u2019t ideal, and it brings up compatibility issues if you plan on adding another DIMM down the line (another area we\u2019ll touch more on in-depth later). But as a stopgap measure amid surging DRAM prices, a single DIMM of DDR5 holds up surprisingly well in gaming scenarios, and it represents a nice on-ramp into a DDR5 platform while prices are out of control. <\/p>\n

Testing single-DIMM DDR5 in games<\/h2>\n

The geomean below speaks for itself. Moving down to a single DIMM drops some performance, but it\u2019s not nearly as stark as I expected. There are some important notes about how we tested before dissecting the results, however. <\/p>\n

As usual, we tested at 1080p with a mixture of High and Ultra settings, using Nvidia\u2019s RTX 5090 Founder\u2019s Edition to minimize the influence of the GPU. That\u2019s even more important here, as we\u2019re not evaluating CPUs but the memory that feeds the CPU. We’re looking at a separate GPU and CPU here, as well; dual-channel memory is vital if you’re using an iGPU. <\/p>\n

We also wanted to create a realistic testing scenario. Assuming you\u2019re going for a 2x16GB configuration, that means starting with a single 16GB DIMM, not a 32GB one. That\u2019s what we did here. Our single-DIMM configurations run with just 16GB of memory, while dual-DIMM configurations run with 32GB. Capacity isn\u2019t a major limitation for our testing here, though it will pose performance issues if you\u2019re running several applications alongside your game. <\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

\"Single-DIMM<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The Ryzen 5 7600X<\/u><\/a> was our biggest loser, dropping 10.9% of its average performance across our 13-game geomean with a single 16GB DIMM. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus<\/u><\/a>, meanwhile, dropped 8.7% of its average performance, while the Core i5-14600K similarly dropped 8.3% of its performance. The 1% lows are especially notable here, scaling with average performance rather than falling off a cliff. <\/p>\n

Unsurprisingly, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D<\/u><\/a> fared the best, dropping just 2.8% of its performance on average. As you\u2019ll see through our individual game tests, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D shows identical performance with two DIMMs and a single DIMM in multiple games. The large and speedy L3 minimizes the impact of using a single DIMM, giving AMD\u2019s 3D V-Cache CPUs another notch in their belt (as if they needed another). <\/p>\n

\n
\"Testing
Tom’s Hardware<\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"Testing
Tom’s Hardware<\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"Testing
Tom’s Hardware<\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n

Our other geomeans don\u2019t say much. A single-DIMM configuration consumes a few watts less, leading to slightly lower efficiency when balanced against the lowered performance. <\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

\"Single-DIMM<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

007 First Light, <\/em>the newest game in our test suite, shows good scaling across our test pool, so it\u2019s a good place to start. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus dropped 8.9% of its performance with a single DIMM, while the 9800X3D dropped 6.5%. The 14600K is worth highlighting here. A single DIMM lost us 7.9%, but that\u2019s still better than dual-channel <\/em>DDR4, and by a decent 6.8% margin. <\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

\"Single-DIMM<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

This trend is fairly consistent, too. Starfield <\/em>is punishing for single-DIMM configurations, with the 14600K losing 10.6% of its average performance. Even then, a single DDR5 DIMM is 6.9% faster than dual-channel DDR4. Intel platforms can scale up to high data rates, and we use 7,200 MT\/s for Intel chips. With slower speeds, the performance will equalize. Still, I\u2019d strongly consider a single DDR5 DIMM if you\u2019ve been eyeing an LGA 1700 platform with DDR4, assuming you\u2019re primarily focused on gaming. <\/p>\n

Starfield <\/em>shows the benefits of 3D V-Cache in this single-DIMM configuration clearly. While the performance losses with other CPUs are brutal in this title, the 9800X3D dropped just a few frames, a 1.6% decrease in average performance. <\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

\"Single-DIMM<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Doom: The Dark Ages <\/em>is similarly harsh on single-DIMM configurations. The Ryzen 5 7600X dropped 17.3% of its average performance, and the 270K Plus fell by 14%. The 9800X3D holds up well, however, with just a 4.2% average performance loss. Marvel\u2019s Spider-Man 2 <\/em>(in the gallery below) shows a similar dynamic. <\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

\"Single-DIMM<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

However, the addition of 3D V-Cache mainly helps in these games where we see bigger losses with other CPUs. There are several games in our suite where the performance loss between a single DIMM and dual-channel configuration was minor, particularly in GPU-heavy titles. The Last of Us Part One <\/em>shows that in action. <\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

\"Single-DIMM<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Similarly, the performance loss is minor in Counter-Strike 2, <\/em>just a handful of frames even north of 600 FPS. <\/em>Even the Core i5-14600K, which was hit the hardest by far, dropped just 5.9% of its average performance (and it\u2019s still faster than a dual-channel DDR4 configuration). <\/p>\n

\n
\"Testing
Tom’s Hardware<\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"Testing
Tom’s Hardware<\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"Testing
Tom’s Hardware<\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"Testing
Tom’s Hardware<\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"Testing
Tom’s Hardware<\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"Testing
Tom’s Hardware<\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"Testing
Tom’s Hardware<\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"Testing
Tom’s Hardware<\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n

You can browse the results of the other games we tested in the gallery above, though they tell much the same story as the titles we highlighted. The two biggest learnings from this testing are that a single, fast DDR5 DIMM often outpaces dual-channel DDR4, and that AMD\u2019s 3D V-Cache can smooth over the rough edges of using a single DIMM, particularly in those memory-sensitive titles. <\/p>\n

How we tested<\/h2>\n

We tested on our normal test bed that we use for CPU reviews, with the only difference being dropping one of our DIMMs. As usual, we enabled XMP\/EXPO for testing, both on single- and dual-DIMM configurations, opting for higher speeds on Intel platforms. AMD\u2019s sweet spot is around 6,000 MT\/s. <\/p>\n

The data rate is noteworthy for the DDR4 comparison, in particular. With slower DDR5, we expect the delta between dual-channel DDR4 and single-DIMM DDR5 to decrease. <\/p>\n

In addition to enabling XMP\/EXPO, we disable Virtualization-Based Security (VBS), enable Resizeable BAR, and disable any automatic overclocking features that aren\u2019t covered by warranty, including AMD\u2019s Precision Boost Overdrive and Intel\u2019s Extreme performance profile. <\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Intel LGA 1851 (Arrow Lake Refresh)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Motherboard<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

ASRock Z890 Taichi<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

RAM<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo RGB DDR5-7200<\/u><\/a> \/ 1x16GB DDR5-7200<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AMD AM5 (Zen 5, Zen 4)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Motherboard<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Gigabyte Aorus X870E Elite X3D ICE<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

RAM<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo RGB DDR5-6000<\/u><\/a> \/ 1x16GB DDR5-6000<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Intel LGA 1700 (Raptor Lake)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Motherboard<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

MSI MPG Z790 Carbon Wi-Fi<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

RAM <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo RGB DDR5-7200<\/u><\/a> \/ 1x16GB DDR5-7200<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Intel LGA 1700 DDR4 (Raptor Lake<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Motherboard<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

MSI MPG Z690 Edge Wi-Fi DDR4<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

RAM <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4x8GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB DDR4-3200<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

All Systems<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Gaming CPU<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Founder\u2019s Edition<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Cooler<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Corsair iCue Link H150i RGB<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Storage<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2TB Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

PSU<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

MSI MPG A1000GS<\/u><\/a>, Gigabyte UD1000GM PG5 V2<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Other<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Arctic MX-4 TIM<\/u><\/a>, Windows 11 Pro, Alamengda open test bench<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Complexities of DDR5<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n

\"Single-DIMM<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

DDR5 has much higher data rates compared to DDR4 (2x or more), and that\u2019s the result of significantly more complexity on DDR5 DIMMs compared to DDR4. Notably for this testing are the two 32-bit subchannels of DDR5, as well as enlarged prefetch and bank groups. You are getting half the total bandwidth with a single DDR5 DIMM, absolutely, but it\u2019s a little more nuanced than simply running your memory in a single-channel configuration. <\/p>\n

DDR4 uses a single 72-bit channel, and 64 of those bits transfer data (the additional 8 are for ECC). With DDR5, you get two 40-bit subchannels, 32 of which are used for data transfer. Critically, these subchannels have their own Command\/Address (CA) interface, allowing them to operate independently of each other. <\/p>\n

In addition, DDR5 doubles the prefetch size to 16N, doubles the number of banks and bank groups, and increases burst length from 8 bytes to 16 bytes. The math here is straightforward enough. With DDR4, you can transfer 64 bits of data over the interface at a burst of 8 bytes, giving you 64 bytes of data and aligning with cache line sizes. Each of the subchannels in DDR5 can transfer 64 bytes of data, as well, with a 32-bit width and burst length of 16 bytes. <\/p>\n

It\u2019s pseudo-dual-channel memory on a single DIMM. There are two independent memory operations that can happen each cycle, both of which transfer 64 bytes of data. That is a big reason why even a single DDR5 DIMM (particularly one with a higher data rate) can outpace even a proper dual-channel DDR4 configuration. <\/p>\n

The common wisdom about using a single DIMM comes mainly from previous DDR generations, where you can only get that single 64-byte transfer each cycle, necessitating a second DIMM to have two independent operations. <\/p>\n

Let me be clear: two DDR5 DIMMs are still better. Instead of two operations per cycle, you can perform four. The main difference is that, for modern CPUs and games, just those two operations give you the vast majority of your performance, and you don\u2019t run into a massive performance bottleneck as you do with just a single operation via DDR4. After all, there are still a lot <\/em>of DDR4 systems out there. <\/p>\n

On the issue of compatibility<\/h2>\n

The elephant in the room with upgrading to a DDR5 platform with a single DIMM is compatibility. If you get a single DDR5 DIMM now, you should plan to add another in the future. Unfortunately, there aren\u2019t a lot of easy answers when it comes to combining two DIMMs that aren\u2019t in a kit together. It should <\/em>work, but mixing and matching can lead to stability issues and\/or lowered performance. <\/p>\n

Generally, combining two DIMMs of the same spec should work. For instance, if you bought this Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6000 CL30 DIMM<\/u><\/a> to start your new build, and then bought a second one later, it should work. \u201cShould\u201d carries a lot of weight on its shoulders, however. Maybe Patriot sources DRAM from multiple places, or your second DIMM\u2019s timings don\u2019t completely align with your first. That could cause stability or performance issues.<\/p>\n

There have been some attempts to get past this hurdle, such as the ROG Certified program<\/u><\/a> with select Asus motherboards, but it\u2019s impossible to know for sure if two separate DIMMs will work together or not without testing. The best you can do is to make sure you buy the same brand of memory, with the same spec, if you add a second DIMM. Make sure to keep your receipt handy in the event you need to return it, as well. <\/p>\n

Once you have your second DIMM, make sure to test it first at stock JEDEC speeds\/timings (no XMP\/EXPO). Run games or applications you normally run, and then use a utility like MemTest64<\/u><\/a> to check for stability. I\u2019d recommend keeping your PC running in this state for a few days to see if any BSODs, application crashes, or poor performance issues pop up. After that\u2019s done, repeat the process with XMP\/EXPO enabled, assuming you\u2019re using matching DIMMs (incompatible XMP\/EXPO profiles won\u2019t work together).<\/p>\n

Assuming DRAM prices continue at an elevated rate before you upgrade, you may want to consider investing in a dual-channel kit down the line and selling your single DIMM. Even kits can run into compatibility issues, though the likelihood is far, far lower. <\/p>\n<\/article>\n

Read the full article →<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jake Roach • July 31, 2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14554","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-it-hardware"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.theck1.no\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14554","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.theck1.no\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.theck1.no\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.theck1.no\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.theck1.no\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14554"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/news.theck1.no\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14554\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news.theck1.no\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14554"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.theck1.no\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14554"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news.theck1.no\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14554"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}